Monday, March 23, 2015

Pipes: On Obamacare's 5th Birthday

Health care expert Sally Pipes marks the 5th birthday of Obamacare with a painful reality check of the changes the health care law has made.

Promise: lower premiums by up to $2,500 per year for typical family.
2014 insurance premiums are 24.4% higher than they would have been without Obamacare, according to the National Bureau of Economic Research.
Promise:  protect vulnerable patient populations from increases in drug prices.
Drug costs are being shifted to patients. In 2015, more than 40% of all 'silver' exchange plans -- the most commonly purchased -- are charging patients 30% or more of the total cost of their specialty drugs. Only 27% of silver plans did so last year.Drug costs for these patients have skyrocketed as costs of drugs were shifted to patients.
Promise:  more choice, more competition, lower costs for millions of Americans.
The Government Accountability Office reports that insurers have left the market in droves. In 2013, 1,232 carriers offered insurance coverage in the individual market. By 2015, that number had shrunk to 310.
Promise:  Government spending on Obamacare will be only $900 billion over 10 years.
This month, the Congressional Budget Office estimated the law's 10-year cost will reach $1.2 trillion.
Promise:  Obamacare will cover 34 million uninsured Americans by 2021.
The Congressional Budget Office revised that estimate to 25 million obtaining coverage by 2025. Moreover 89% of Americans who have signed up for Obamacare in 2013 were already insured and simply switched insurance plans.
Promise:  Obamacare will let you keep your doctor and your hospital.
McKinsey & Co. noted that roughly two-thirds of the hospital networks available on the exchanges were either "narrow" or ultra-narrow," meaning Obamacare plans refused to partner with at least 30% of the area's hospitals. Other plans exclude more than 70%. More than 60% of doctors plan to retire earlier than anticipated -- by 2016 or sooner, according to Deloitte. Coverage is worthless if patients can't find a doctor or hospital who will see them.
 "Time and again," writes Pipes, "Obama has been proven wrong about what his health law would accomplish. Quality hasn't improved, and costs continue to grow out of control.  So far at least, that's Obamacare's legacy."

Upcoming Midwest Women's Summit

The Clare Boothe Luce Policy Institute will host a unique retreat for conservative women in the Minneapolis/St. Paul area on April 23-25, 2015. For the agenda and an updated list of speakers, visit the registration page.

Women's History Month: Meet Clare Boothe Luce, Preeminent Renaissance Woman of the 20th Century

March is Women’s History Month and schools around the country will be championing women of acclaim both past and present. Here’s one woman that school children may not know, even though she was one of the most acclaimed and accomplished women of the 20th Century.
Born in 1903, Clare Boothe Luce blazed many trails for women during her lifetime, becoming editor of Vanity Fair magazine, a female European and Asian war journalist in the WWII era, an acclaimed author and playwright, a two-term U.S. Congresswoman, and the first woman to be appointed U.S. Ambassador to a major nation.
Her stunning beauty was matched only by her razor-sharp mind and ambition. By age 16, one biographer wrote, she had set her life goals: “to be fluent in four languages, marry a publisher, and write something that would be remembered. She would achieve all three.”
Shortly after finishing school, 18-year-old Clare spent a brief period working as assistant to militant feminist Alva Belmont, founder of the National Women’s Party. Belmont saw in Clare’s “intelligence, speaking ability and charm” an opportunity to “help destroy the notion that feminist activists had to be rich chesty old matrons or disgruntled, plain spinsters,” as one biographer noted. But militant feminism was not for Clare, and their association was short-lived.
At age 20, Clare married socialite playboy George Tuttle Brokaw and gave birth to her only child, Ann, a year later. When the marriage ended six years later, Clare began work as a writer, first writing captions for Vogue magazine, and later as Assistant Editor and Managing Editor of Vanity Fairmagazine, where she was lauded for her innovative ideas and editorial skill.
Leaving Vanity Fair, Clare turned her attention to playwriting in 1933. She wrote 10 plays in six years, three of which received wide acclaim. Her most famous work, The Women, ran for 657 performances on Broadway and was twice made into a movie (1939 and 2008). Another work, Come to the Stable, gained her an Academy Award nomination for Best Writing: Motion Picture Story.
In 1935, Clare married Henry “Harry” R. Luce, founder, publisher and owner of Time and Fortune magazines. Individually influential and successful, they were an ideal match in intellect and interest in political and world affairs.
As troubles grew in Europe in the late 1930s, Clare spent several months touring Europe as a roving journalist for Life magazine. She became dismayed by the complacency she witnessed. Italy was unconcerned by German’s occupation of Austria and Poland. The French believed war was coming, but that they were amply protected by the Maginot Line of fortified eastern border defenses. Britain, too, felt secure. Clare believed otherwise, that they—and America—were being lulled into a dangerous illusion.
As Germany invaded Denmark, Norway, and Sweden and advanced through Belgium into France, Clare wrote and published Europe in the Spring in 1940. Reprinted 8 times, her book, noted one biographer, “helped shape public opinion as Americans tried to make sense of the escalating crisis in Europe.”
Clare spent much of next two years reporting from Asia, logging over 75,000 miles of air travel in 1942 alone. In uncanny timing, her in-depth interview of General Douglas MacArthur ran as the cover story in Life magazine on December 8, 1941, the day after the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor.
By now, Clare was an outspoken critic of FDR’s handling of world affairs. She won a seat in the U.S. Congress in 1943 representing her largely Democratic Connecticut district. Clare garnered national attention when media focused on this single line in her debut speech in Congress: “But much of what [Vice President] Wallace calls his global thinking is, no matter how you slice it, still globaloney.”
On January 11, 1944, Clare’s 19-year-old daughter, Ann, was killed in a car crash while driving back to Stanford University after a visit with her mother. A devastated Clare asked Catholic Monsignor Fulton J. Sheen, If God is good, why did he take my daughter? The question would lead to many conversations with Sheen and culminate in Clare’s conversion to Catholicism in 1946. One life-long friend described the transformation: “Twenty years ago she was like a diamond—beautiful, brilliant and cold. Now she is beautiful, brilliant and compassionate. She has become a kind and remarkably unselfish woman.”
In December 1944, Clare was chosen Woman of the Year by an Associated Press poll of American newspaper editors, because, as one editor explained, “no legislator had won greater renown in a single term.” Over her two terms in office, Clare was credited with 18 major initiatives espousing the causes of human rights. In its first annual international poll in March 1948, Gallup ranked Clare the fourth most admired woman in the world.
As WWII came to a conclusion, Clare foresaw a new threat to democracy: communism and the Soviet Union. In nationally-broadcast debates, Clare argued that communism was as totalitarian as Nazism, and that the United States’ post-war mission would be to prevent the spread of communism throughout Europe.
During the 1952 presidential campaign, Clare made no less than 100 personal, radio and television appearances on behalf of GOP candidate Dwight Eisenhower. When President-elect Eisenhower asked what post she would like in his administration, she replied, “Naturally, what I can’t get: Rome.” Such a major post had never been given to a woman. In a daring move, Ike awarded her the post.
Confirmed unanimously by the Senate, Ambassador Clare Boothe Luce arrived to face the skepticism of both Italians and the embassy’s Democratic senior staff hold-overs. Italy in 1953 was at a tipping point between democracy and communism, and the new ambassador was tasked with apprising Italians that the good will of the United States depended on Italy remaining democratic: a message she diligently conveyed to government and business leaders at every opportunity.
Italy was also embroiled in a bitter battle with Yugoslavia over control of the Adriatic port of Trieste. Ambassador Luce proposed a plan for a Trieste resolution, which received the endorsement of the Eisenhower administration. After 18 months of hard negotiations, Yugoslavia and Italy signed the final Treaty of Trieste.
The Treaty won her praise in Italy and at home. One of Italy’s oldest newspapers, Corriere della Sera, editorialized: “Perhaps never in the whole of history has a great nation owed so much to so small, fragile and gentle a woman.” The New York Times wrote, “The Trieste agreement is a victory for Ambassador Clare Boothe Luce, who floated the problem off the reef on which it had foundered some years before her arrival in Italy …Her achievement is the more remarkable because the agreement is, in effect, a carbon copy… of the US-British declaration of October 8, 1953. This declaration … was originally suggested by Mrs. Luce and was made as a result of her insistence.”
Ambassador Luce left Italy in 1956 far better off than she found it: strongly democratic and economically stable. TheWashington Post praised her work: “Judged by the pragmatic test of results, her mission was extremely successful … She worked fantastically hard, even to the detriment of her health, and there was no doubt of her warm friendship for Italy. She brought both dignity and intelligence to her position. Her efforts command the gratitude of her countrymen.”
Although she would continue to serve on presidential advisory boards, she and Harry, who died in 1967, largely retreated from the public eye. Upon her death in 1987, Time magazine eulogized the writer, editor and politician as “the preeminent Renaissance woman of the century.”
Through hard work and determination, Clare Boothe Luce shattered many misguided notions about women and their leadership potential. Once complemented for having a “masculine mind,” Clare retorted, “Thought has no sex. One either thinks, or one does not!”
She deserves to be championed during Women’s History Month.

Monday, March 16, 2015

Survey: Record Low Confidence in Government

"Americans' confidence in all three branches of government is at or near record lows, according to a major survey that has measured attitudes on the subject for 40 years," reports the Associated Press.
The 2014 General Social Survey finds only 23 percent of Americans have a great deal of confidence in the Supreme Court, 11 percent in the executive branch and 5 percent in Congress. By contrast, half have a great deal of confidence in the military.

The survey is conducted by the independent research organization NORC at the University of Chicago. Because of its long-running and comprehensive set of questions about the public, it is a highly regarded source of data about social trends. 
The 11% figure for the presidency "approaches a record low measured by the same survey in 1996, when just 10 percent said they had a great deal of confidence in the executive branch," and the 23% figure for the Supreme Court represents a 40-year low.

Media fared almost as badly as Congress, earning a record-low 7% confidence rating. "Only 1 in 10 has a lot of confidence in television, which is also near a record low," reports the AP.

KT McFarland is the Luce Institute's 2015 Woman of the Year

KT McFarland was presented the Institute's 2015 Woman of the Year award at a luncheon in her honor on February 28, 2015.  (Pictured right: Michelle Easton (l) presents award to KT.)

A national security analyst for Fox News, KT is widely respected for her insight in the area of national security policy.  In her remarks to a large luncheon audience of leading women student activists from around the nation, KT discussed national security issues and offered advice on leadership. Her remarks can be watched on video on our YouTube channel or downloaded on audio at Podbean and iTunes.


Below: KT is congratulated on-air:

Irony: Obama's Amnesty for Illegals Undermines His Obamacare Law

"In the president's zeal to rewrite yet another area of law—immigration—he's sabotaged one of Obamacare's primary goals: expanding employer-sponsored health care," argue constitution law professor Elizabeth Price Foley and former Justice Department attorney David B. Rivkin Jr.

Obama's executive amnesty to 6 million illegals would give them work permits, but it would not allow them to qualify for Obamacare. As a result, they would become "ideal" workers for employers to hire if employers are trying to avoid the massive "employer responsibility tax" — a $2,000 to $3,000 per-employee annual tax imposed by Obamacare on employers for each of their workers who qualifies for Obamacare subsidies through state exchanges.
Because the 6 million immigration beneficiaries aren't eligible for Obamacare tax subsidies, hiring them reduces employers' chances of triggering the employer responsibility tax. Employers have a powerful financial incentive to hire them in place of U.S. citizens and permanent residents. The president's unilateral grant of work permits, combined with the fact that these workers cannot trigger the employer responsibility tax, makes those workers significantly more attractive.  ...  The inevitable result is that more workers will lack employer-provided health insurance coverage. [snip]

The president isn't a one-person lawmaker. He doesn't have the power in our constitutional regime to fix laws he thinks are broken. When a president does so, he not only intrudes on Congress' power, but also creates unpredictable repercussions for other laws. It's no small irony, that, by unilaterally attempt to fix our immigration law, Mr. Obama has undermined his own signature legislative achievement.
Read When Bad Obama Policies Collide.

Monday, March 2, 2015

Voters: Keep Passing Bills Even If Obama is Opposed

"A new Rasmussen Reports poll issued Friday found that 59 percent of voters 'think Congress should continue to pass legislation that most members of Congress support even if the president is opposed'," writes Paul Bedard at the Washington Examiner. "Just 25 percent want Congress to cave into the White House and 16 percent are unsure."
Despite bipartisan support, Obama vetoed the Keystone bill this week, and is promising to use the veto pen much more in his last two years in office.

The poll of 800 likely voters taken this week could also strengthen the backbone of Republicans eager to use the Department of Homeland Security spending bill to punish Obama's decision last year to grant worker amnesty to some 5 million illegal immigrants.

ObamaCare before Supreme Court Wednesday

"On Wednesday, the fate of ObamaCare is in front of the Supreme Court again," writes former NY Lt. Gov. Betsy McCaughey. "At stake are the subsidies intended to make ObamaCare plans 'affordable'."
The letter of the law allows consumers to get subsidies only in the 14 states that set up their own exchanges, not in the rest that didn't. But the Obama administration is ignoring that and doling them out in all 50.

The administration claims that if the court rules against it in King v. Burwell, it will cause a national disaster. Don't believe it. The biggest losers will be insurance companies
.
The losers, should the Court rule against the Obama Administration:
  • about 5.5 million middle-class Americans who get questionable subsidies and who will see their insurance premiums quadruple if taxpayers are no longer required to pay three-quarters of their plans' actual costs; and
  • big insurance companies who have seen their stock prices soar since the Healthcare.gov rollout — Humana up 66%, Cigna up 53% and Aetna up 52%.
The biggest winners, should the Obama Administration lose:
  • people and businesses in the 36 non-exchange states:
    • uninsured people would no longer be forced to pay the Obamacare penalty;
    • 250,000 business with 50 or more full-time workers would no longer face Obamacare penalties; and
    • job-seekers and part-timers hoping for full-time work from businesses that would no longer have an powerful incentive to keep their workforce below 50 full-time employees;
  • the Rule of Law, if the Obama Administration is forced to "faithfully execute" his health care law; and
  • the entire nation, "if Obama is forced to negotiate changes to his unworkable, expensive, overbearing law."
The court's decision, expected in June, will have no impact on the poor — about 90% of all Obamacare sign-ups — since the poor will continue to be subsidized through the federal Medicaid welfare program regardless of the court's decision.