Jonah Goldberg addresses the question,
why there are no libertarian countries today?, raised by Michael Lind in Salon.com.
Such is the philosophical poverty of liberalism today that this stands as a profound question.
Definitions
vary, but broadly speaking, libertarianism is the idea that people
should be as free as possible from state coercion so long as they don’t
harm anyone. The job of the state is limited to fighting crime,
providing for the common defense, and protecting the rights and
contracts of citizens. The individual is sovereign; he is the captain of
himself.
It’s true, no ideal libertarian state has ever existed
outside a table for one. And no such state will ever exist. But here’s
an important caveat: No ideal state of any other kind will be created
either.
America’s great, but it ain’t perfect. Sweden’s social democracy
is all right, but if it were perfect, I suspect fewer cars would be on
fire over there.
Ideals
are called ideals for a reason: They’re ideals. They’re goals,
aspirations, abstract straight rules we use as measuring sticks against
the crooked timber of humanity.
In a fitting tribute to Independence Day, Goldberg quickly weaves through the various experiments of governments and their failures (and Anne Morrow Lindbergh's 1940 that statist governments were the "wave of the future") to conclude:
The only truly new political idea in the last couple thousand years
is this libertarian idea, broadly understood. The revolution wrought by
John Locke, Edmund Burke, Adam Smith, and the Founding Fathers is the
only real revolution going. And it’s still unfolding.
Indeed,
what’s remarkable about all of the states Lind identifies as proof that
libertarianism doesn’t work is that they are in fact proof that it does.
What made the American experiment new were its libertarian innovations,
broadly speaking. Moreover, those innovations made us prosper. Even
Sweden — the liberal Best in Show — owes its successes to its
libertarian concessions.
I’m actually not a full-blown
libertarian myself, but it’s an ideal I’d like America to move closer
to, not further away from as we’ve been doing of late — bizarrely in the
name of “progress,” of all things.
No comments:
Post a Comment