- 5.5 million - That is how many people the administration needs to sign up in just 23 days because Obamacare drove them out of their health-care plans.
- 50 million - That is how many Americans will be surprised to find their employer-based health plans dropped or substantially changed next year because of Obamacare.
- 53 - That is the percentage of Americans who now say that President Obama is not 'honest or trustworthy'.
- 12 - That is the number of Senate Democrats up for reelection in 2014 who are complicit in Obama's lie.
- 7 - That is the number of states with vulnerable Democratic-held senate seats that also have Republican governors.
Showing posts with label voters. Show all posts
Showing posts with label voters. Show all posts
Tuesday, December 3, 2013
Liberals Facing a Tough 2014
Liberals are "praying that this weekend’s relaunch of the Obamacare Web site will save them from an electoral bloodbath in 2014. Their hopes are misplaced. Here are five numbers that suggest that public anger over Obamacare will only grow as Election Day 2014 approaches," writes Marc Thiessen in the Washington Post.
Thursday, May 2, 2013
Out-Spent, Out-Numbered, Out-Researched
"We've read plenty about women voters who supported President Obama
55-44, creating an 11-point gender gap," writes Sabrina Schaeffer. "But we have paid scant attention
to the wealth of Progressive
women’s organizations that helped drive this victory, their vast
funding capability, or the fact that they’re armed with a new science of
politics."
Schaeffer lists several of the many liberal "research, grassroots, and fundraising machines" that pour resources into wooing women: Emily's List—$51 million; Catalyst—$12 million; League of Women Voters—$9 million; Women's Voices Women Vote/WVWV Action—$8 million.
Schaeffer lists several of the many liberal "research, grassroots, and fundraising machines" that pour resources into wooing women: Emily's List—$51 million; Catalyst—$12 million; League of Women Voters—$9 million; Women's Voices Women Vote/WVWV Action—$8 million.
Against this tapestry of Progressive organizations pouring millions into research and programs, what do we have on the Right? The reality is when it comes to securing women voters conservatives are out-numbered, out-researched, and outspent.Read her full article in Forbes.
AEI’s Christina Hoff Sommers said it best at a recent IWF policy forum, “Conservative leaders and funders don’t take women’s issues seriously. They tend to treat women’s groups like the Ladies Auxiliary and women’s issues as a distracting side show.”
Sommers is right... The Right can count among their ranks exceptional individuals like Hoff Sommers, Diana Furchgott-Roth, June O’Neill, Carrie Lukas, and Kay Hymowitz, writing independently at different think tanks. There are a handful of women’s groups like the Independent Women’s Forum, where I’m the executive director, and our sister organization the Independent Women’s Voice, as well as Concerned Women for America, Clare Boothe Luce Policy Institute, Smart Girl Politics, and VIEW Pac, which raised a mere $346,000 during the 2012 election to help elect Republican women candidates.
What the Right lacks is serious interest and investment in finding out how to move more women to our side. If conservatives truly want to shrink the gender gap and win elections, women can no longer be an after-thought. Conservatives need to invest meaningful resources into the groups that are speaking to women. And conservatives must embrace social science research, digital communications, and boots on the ground to find out what works and with whom.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
